Missouri State Rep. John Diehl, R-Town and Country, held a town hall meeting at the Brentwood Recreation Center Thursday night.
The Republican represents Missouri’s 87th district in the State House of Representatives. The district includes Town and Country, Brentwood, Frontenac, Ladue, Rock Hill, Crystal Lake Park and Webster Groves, among other municipalities.
With all of the changes to St. Louis area congressional districts taking place, one might think that redistricting would dominate the meeting. However, the subject matter of the town hall was largely decided by his constituents and they wanted to discuss puppy mills.
The meeting lasted about one hour and 20 minutes. Roughly half that time was dedicated to a back and forth between Diehl and supporters of and dog-breeding reform.
In November, voters narrowly passed the Puppy Mill Cruelty Act, otherwise known as Prop B. It sought to toughen regulations on dog breeders, whose operations are often referred to as puppy mills, in Missouri. Since November, however, representatives from rural parts of the state have backed Special Bill 113, a bill that would change the Prop B legislation and, according to some, water it down.
Diehl was largely in agreement with those in attendance, and said he supported more regulation of dog-breeding operations. However, Diehl said that SB 113 “is going to pass,” and he wasn’t sure if Governor Jay Nixon would veto it. Ladue resident Nancy Grove said Diehl should vote against SB 113 outright. However, Diehl stated that he felt he could do more by negotiating and finding some middle ground between Prop B and SB 113.
Others in the crowd also voiced their disdain for SB 113, not so much out of a love for animals, but out of a distaste for seeing the government in Jefferson City not abiding by something that was voted on by the people and passed.
One Brentwood resident, who wished to not be named, said he felt SB 113 was like a dictator overruling the will of the people. “That’s what it feels like to me,” he said. “It’s very offensive.”
“Why bother to carry these petitions? Why bother to vote?” Margot Martin, Frontenac resident, asked.
Many in crowd wore buttons that read, “Defend Prop B For Dog’s Sake.” Others wore T-shirts saying things like “Stop puppy mills.”
“I now have my second puppy mill rescue dog,” Crystal Lake Park resident Helena Servis said. “I’m here to tell you it’s a travesty how we procure our animals.” Servis said she is not usually politically active, but Prop B is different.
Though Prop B and SB 113 dominated the meeting, other issues were addressed.
Brentwood Ward 3 Alderman Andrew Leahy voiced a concern over the new four-year term for elected officials in fourth-class Missouri cities, though fourth-class cities now have no way to recall elected officials. Leahy brought this up to Diehl because he said changing that law would require a change in a state statute.
Diehl said he supports the ability of cities like Brentwood to hold officials responsible and would look into the matter.
Leahy also asked about Diehl’s views on proposed changes to in St. Louis County that would allow municipalities with a large amount of retail to keep more of their own sales tax.
“I don’t support any of those changes,” Diehl said, though he said it is a valid discussion. “I don’t think it’s going anywhere this year, but it could be part of larger discussion.”
Rock Hill resident and teacher Amy Doyle asked a question about any forthcoming changes to tenure and merit-based pay for public school teachers.
“I would be really surprised if we get any education bills out of the house this year,” Diehl said in response.
Former Town and Country Alderwoman Barbara Ann Hughes brought up the topic of the . Hughes said she is “anti-kill” and believes that sterilization is much more effective.
“I’ll leave that to the City of Town and Country,” Diehl told Patch after the meeting. “They have my applause for addressing the issue, and I respect the decision of the aldermen and the mayor, and they can do without interference from us.”
Diehl brought with him a large map of Missouri that showed the new districts proposed by house Republicans and passed by the house as whole. Diehl chaired a Congressional redistricting committee, tasked with reducing Missouri’s nine congressional districts into eight.
“All the districts have to get much, much larger,” Diehl said. “Ten years ago, the average size of the districts was 621,000 people. The districts we are drawing today are 750,000 people...From a state rep stand point, I have about 36,000 (constituents), so I can’t even imagine what 750,000 is like.”
Diehl said that the old First District and the old Third District lost the greatest amount of population statewide. Diehl said that all of St. Louis city will now be in the new First District along with parts of North County and the new Second District will comprise the rest of St. Louis County, as well as chunks of St. Charles and Jefferson County.
Though many in the room spoke passionately, only at one point did any tempers come close to flaring.
Many in the crowd responded with jeers when a man who would only identify himself as John from Des Peres said that he felt all the talk about Prop B was “unimportant and a distraction...a waste of time.”
Even those who criticized Diehl the loudest during the meeting still chatted with the representative amicably afterward, with both parties thanking each other for their time.
The only reason why SB 113 would pass is if reps from districts who voted for Prop B go against the wishes of the people in their district. And the time to "make changes" or "have a compromise" on SB 113 is past -- they perfected the bill in the House. Diehl has made no attempt at compromise. But no one wants to say no to the powerful agribusiness lobby. This is literally representatives giving into special interests in defiance to the people of their district, and this state. It's pure politics of the worst kind.
Such disdain for the voters should be repaid in kind in the next election.
Watch this 'illegal ' video of Missouri breeders auctioning off America's pets... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBDUeShAnIs "Show Me" WHAT, Missouri? Cruelty? Abuse? Inhumanity? Greed? All of the above.
Bonnie must have "blinders" on... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBI4ZRNifgY&p=48CBCC6EF6CDF71E http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGiMC0STKlY&feature=relmfu http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWQGYyRgImo&feature=relmfu http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwKTsUTIgSw&feature=relmfu http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1x0a_L2v_Y&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr-ux_Ejke4&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1demtWIlF4&feature=related
You criminals be able to gut Prop B but you will NEVER reverse public opinion. Wanna see ? You can rant and accuse and excuse but you cannot HIDE. http://www.idausa.org/campaigns/puppy/investigations.html http://www.usda.gov./oig/webdocs/33002-4-SF.pdf http://www.nowisconsinpuppymills.com/what-to-do.html http://www.prisonersofgreed.org/Commercial-kennel-facts.html http://www.youtube.com/user/remix227#p/u/9/9g6G_75Eipk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57wJ4kWwbd0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wTsbTHyLio The DUH heard round the world. "Show Me" the knuckleheads.
SURVEY: TWICE AS MANY CONSUMERS BELIEVE HSUS, PETA ON ANIMAL WELFARE THAN FARM ORGANIZATIONS Oct. 11, 2010 How's that workin' for ya'. Bonnie? How much money has Humanewatch spent on their HSUS smear campaign, Bonnie? How many times did your Humanewatch peanut-heads repeat lies about HSUS and Katrina? http://www.humanesociety.org/assets/pdfs/about/wsb_letter_re_berman.pdf How long did the Humanewatch bobble-heads worship at the Altar Of Martosko before he was outed for his egregious and indefensible behavior? http://www.aboutdavidmartosko.com/david_martosko_rap_sheet.pdf You folks got a lot of splainin' to do.
We do care what you say when you perpetuate lies which contribute to animal abuse. And we would be most interested in knowing how you "know" who pays our "salary". Is this typical of everything else you 'know'?
April 08, 2011 http://www2.nbc4i.com/news/2011/apr/08/3/local-8-year-old-girl-teaches-kids-about-puppy-mil-ar-447833/ OMG, an 8yr. old RADICAL!!!! And a terrorist, according to Rep. (brain surgeon) Jeanie Riddle Let's hope the humanewatchers don't get ahold of this child and try to exorcise out Wayne..
http://www.agrimarketing.com/show_story.php?id=63105 SURVEY: TWICE AS MANY CONSUMERS BELIEVE HSUS, PETA ON ANIMAL WELFARE THAN FARM ORGANIZATIONSOct. 11, 2010 New research from the Center for Food Integrity (CFI) shows that most consumers are twice as likely to believe the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) over farm organizations when it comes to humane treatment of farm animals. After HSUS and PETA, farm animal veterinarians, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and university experts ranked next, followed by state and national farm organizations and small livestock farmers. Large-scale livestock farmers ranked last in animal welfare credibility.
By the way, I don't think the bill is perfected in the House, at this point.
Ruth Keezer thinks the majority of Americans are STUPID. Insulting or what... http://www.prwatch.org/node/8894 http://humanewatch.info/ http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/politics&id=4140447 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i75WwystZo
Puuuleeze. Who exactly is going to buy your idiot story? Try harder, noodlehead. People are not that stupid.
What EXACTLY is your problem? Do you have a legitimate grievance? If you state it clearly without the commentary, and you have actually been wronged, I am certain that many people will try to assist, regardless of their position on any issue. As it stands, your anti-hsus rant labels you a troll. Those videos have NOTHING to do with the hsus. So, please, what is the problem?
You should have said so. Doesn't look like much place to "raise a family", but of course that is your affair. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy2lmiB6wEA " All our videos are obtained legally from public property without tresspassing, so what you see in the video is the same as you would see if you drove by on the road." (BestFriendsVideos)
NO ONE that we know or want to know would send anonymous letters to anyone, regardless of the reason. The video says it all, as far as we are concerned. If you are going to live 'by the sword', though, you must expect swords in return. We personally do not believe in this, but unfortunately many people do.
Possibly it is a coincidence .........someone with the same name living in he same place. http://www.facebook.com/people/Dawn-Eminger-Walker/838294971 This person has the same name and lives in the same place as the puppy-mill. I was actually trying to help. If it is not you, what can anyone do? If your home is in the video and you are not connected with the kennel, why not write a polite letter to Best Friends and ask if they can either edit or remove the video. Send them copies of the annoying letters. I am not connected with them but I am certain they are reasonable people.